This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Current Storage Deficit - "If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging." - Will Rogers

Ed Reid's picture
Vice President, Marketing (Retired) / Executive Director (Retired) / President (Retired), Columbia Gas Distribution Companies / American Gas Cooling Center / Fire to Ice, Inc.

Industry Participation: Natural Gas Industry Research, Development and Demonstration Initiative Chair, Cooling Committee (1996-1999)   American Gas Association Marketing Section...

  • Member since 2003
  • 845 items added with 66,606 views
  • Apr 9, 2024
  • 208 views

The Right Insight

 

Current Storage Deficit - ORIGNAL CONTENT

By:
Edward A. Reid Jr.
Posted On:
Apr 9, 2024 at 6:00 AM
Category
Energy Policy, Climate Change

Originally published here.

In a summary of a recent peer-reviewed paper, the principal author stated that an electric grid predominantly powered by intermittent renewables such as wind and solar would require storage approximately equal to 25% of annual generation to be reliable. Other studies have reported similar results (here, here and here).

US wind and solar generation in 2023 totaled approximately 575,000 GWH. Based on the Fekete paper, the US would require a total of approximately 140,000 GWH of electricity storage to render this intermittent generation dispatchable, capable of replacing fossil fueled dispatchable generation. The US currently has approximately 60 GWH of battery storage and approximately 25,000 GWH of pumped hydro storage. This leaves an estimated storage deficit of approximately 115,000 GWH.

The primary battery storage system currently being installed for grid level storage is the Tesla Megapack, which stores 19.3 MWH deliverable at a rate of 4.9 MW over a 4-hour period. Eliminating the current US electricity storage deficit with Tesla Megapacks would require installation of 5,887,347 units at an estimated installed cost of $8,128,870 per unit, for a total installed cost of $48 trillion.

Research suggests that battery life can be extended by operating the batteries between 20% and 80% of full charge. Grid scale batteries would be expected to operate below 20% of full charge very rarely, so the lower limit can essentially be ignored. However, limiting the batteries to a maximum charge of 80%, while maintaining necessary electricity storage would require increasing the installed battery capacity by 25%, at an installed cost of approximately $12 trillion, increasing the total battery system installed cost to approximately $60 trillion. (Note: These costs do not include the land required for installation or the cost of grid connection.)

Tesla reports a roundtrip efficiency of approximately 95% for its Megapacks, significantly higher than the approximate 80% efficiency reported by EIA. NREL estimates current 4-hour battery costs at $500 per kWh, which is projected to drop to approximately $250 per kWh by 2050. The Tesla Megapack stores 19,600 kWh at an installed cost of approximately $415 per kWh.

Wind and solar currently generate approximately 12% of US utility scale electricity. Hydro, biomass and geothermal generate approximately 8%. Nuclear generates approximately 20%. The remaining 60% is generated using fossil fuels. Replacing these fossil fuel generators with dispatchable wind and solar generation plus storage would require installation of wind and solar capable of generating approximately an additional 2,540,000 GWH of electricity and storage capable of storing approximately an additional 630,000 GWH of electricity, preferably with much longer duration storage capability.

With apologies to the late Senator Everett McKinley Dirksen (R, IL);
“A trillion here. A trillion there. Soon you’re talking about real money.”

 

Discussions
Julian Jackson's picture
Julian Jackson on Apr 10, 2024

This is a serious challenge and it is good that you pointed it out. We have to reduce to zero fossil fuel use or the planet will fry.  Battery storage facilities are part of the mix, but it is not the sole solution. For example with more EVs on the road we will be able to use their batteries when not in use. Demand-side moderation, using IoT will help.  I also hold out some hope for new nuclear, particularly SMRs. So I don't think we will need the impractical level of storage you suggest.

Ed Reid's picture
Ed Reid on Apr 10, 2024

First, I do not agree that Net Zero is necessary or desirable.

The Administration is pushing "all-electric everything", which would dramatically increase demand and consumption.

The Administration is also pushing for shutdown of coal and natural gas generators. Fossil generation capacity is being reduced faster than it is being replaced by dispatchable generation of whatever type.

We either make the current intermittent generation dispatchable, add alternative dispatchable generation, or deal with the resulting unreliability.

I have a problem with involuntary IoT DSM, including discharging EV batteries for grid support.

I agree that the cost of battery storage is extremely high, but the cost of ignoring backup for intermittent generation is higher.

It should already be abundantly clear that wind and solar are not the path to reduced energy costs.

Michael Keller's picture
Michael Keller on Apr 15, 2024

Only way out of this manufactured looming economic catastrophe is to replace the current administration.

Ed Reid's picture
Thank Ed for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »