This group brings together the best thinkers on energy and climate. Join us for smart, insightful posts and conversations about where the energy industry is and where it is going.

Post

Social cost of co2 emission

image credit: https://news.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/BANNER-5_2-V2@2x1.png
Aniket Kumar's picture
Product Manager, Yokogawa Electric Corporation

Aniket is currently leading product management role and developing the next version of disruptive products for sustainability of multiple sectors and building success stories & new business...

  • Member since 2023
  • 56 items added with 21,980 views
  • Feb 3, 2023
  • 798 views

The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is a measure of the economic damages associated with each additional ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in a given year. It includes the direct effects of emissions on human health, such as respiratory problems, as well as indirect effects, such as the long-term impacts of climate change on ecosystems, economies, and societies.

One of the most significant impacts of CO2 emissions is on global temperature. The increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is causing the Earth's temperature to rise, which in turn is leading to changes in precipitation patterns, sea levels, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heatwaves, droughts, and hurricanes.

The impacts of these climate changes are far-reaching and often severe. For example, rising temperatures are causing the melting of polar ice caps and glaciers, leading to a rise in sea levels that threaten coastal cities and communities. Climate change is also altering ecosystems, disrupting migration patterns of wildlife, and altering the composition and productivity of agricultural lands.

In addition to the impacts on the natural world, climate change is having significant economic consequences as well. As temperatures continue to rise, productivity in many sectors, such as agriculture, tourism, and forestry, is being impacted. This is leading to declining economic growth and increased poverty in many regions.

The economic impacts of climate change are particularly pronounced in developing countries, where infrastructure and institutions are often less resilient to the impacts of natural disasters and other climate-related events. In these countries, economic losses due to extreme weather events are often compounded by disruptions to trade, transportation, and other key economic activities.

The current market rate of the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) is not a fixed value, as it is estimated using complex economic models that take into account a range of factors, including the impacts of climate change, the costs of mitigation and adaptation measures, and the uncertainties associated with these estimates.

As of 2021, the estimated range for the SCC in the United States was $51 to $131 per ton of CO2 emissions. However, this range is subject to change as new information becomes available and economic models are refined.

It's important to note that the SCC is not a market price, but rather an estimate of the economic damages associated with each additional ton of CO2 emissions. The SCC is used by policy makers to inform the development of regulations and other policy measures aimed at reducing emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

The costs of inaction in terms of the social cost of CO2 emissions are significant, but they can be reduced through the implementation of effective and efficient mitigation and adaptation measures. The most effective way to reduce emissions is through the implementation of policies that incentivize the transition to low-carbon technologies and practices, such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, and sustainable land use practices.

Adaptation measures, such as the development of early warning systems and disaster risk reduction measures, can also help to reduce the impacts of climate change and the associated social costs. In addition, investments in research and development can lead to the development of new technologies that can help to mitigate the impacts of climate change, while also providing new economic opportunities.

In conclusion, the social cost of CO2 emissions is a significant and growing problem, but it can be reduced through a combination of mitigation and adaptation measures. While the costs of inaction are substantial, the benefits of action in terms of reduced impacts and increased economic opportunities are also substantial. As such, it is important for governments, businesses, and individuals to work together to address the social cost of CO2 emissions and reduce their impact on the world.

Discussions
Mark Silverstone's picture
Mark Silverstone on Feb 6, 2023

I would like to know more about the calculation of the SCC.

As of 2021, the estimated range for the SCC in the United States was $51 to $131 per ton of CO2 emissions.

It’s possible that the cost of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) could  be justified if the basis of SCC calculations are accepted. 
 

Is it coincidence that current costs for CCS are in the same general range as SCC?

Aniket Kumar's picture
Aniket Kumar on Feb 8, 2023

It's not necessarily a coincidence that the current costs for carbon capture and storage (CCS) are in the same general range as the social cost of carbon (SCC). The cost of CCS technology has been decreasing in recent years, and as the technology becomes more widespread and economically competitive, it is becoming increasingly viable as a means of reducing emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

The SCC estimate is used as a metric for determining the benefits of reducing emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change, and CCS is one of the many tools that can be used to achieve these goals. The costs of CCS are influenced by a number of factors, including the type of capture technology used, the location and availability of suitable storage sites, and the cost of retrofitting existing power plants and industrial facilities with CCS equipment.

In general, the SCC provides a useful benchmark for comparing the costs of different mitigation options, and can help policymakers to make informed decisions about how best to reduce emissions and minimize the costs of climate change impacts. The close relationship between the SCC and the costs of CCS technology may be seen as a sign that CCS is becoming a more cost-effective option for reducing emissions, and that the social benefits of reducing emissions are becoming increasingly aligned with the costs of mitigation.

Aniket Kumar's picture
Aniket Kumar on Feb 8, 2023

To calculate the SCC, an interdisciplinary team of economists, climate scientists, and other experts use models that simulate the impacts of emissions and the benefits of mitigation actions. These models consider the complex interplay between emissions, the climate system, and the economy, and estimate the social benefits and costs associated with reducing emissions.

Julian Silk's picture
Julian Silk on Feb 6, 2023

It's very important to know who is doing the calculation for the social cost of carbon, because certain items may be weighed such that they promote goals, and not really assess the damages.  Here is one example, by Resources for the Future, which is a think tank trying to promote environmental remediation, based in Washington, DC.  

An extremely hostile view, by a very conservative organization, is at 

What is relevant is that the cost has to include all the relevant factors, and then the number goes up.  The Heritage Foundation argument for negative results follows the older Deschenes and Greenstone article in The American Economic Review, which focused on corn, and downplayed crop disease, increased viability of weeds, or weather-related volatility, with resulting property damage and human injury or mortality.  The people who are trying to use the measure should check what the Resources for the Future figure includes as damages, and try to weight whether all factors have been included.  It is entirely possible that the Resources for the Future figure is an underestimate, but it has to be looked at carefully.

Aniket Kumar's picture
Aniket Kumar on Feb 8, 2023

To calculate the SCC, an interdisciplinary team of economists, climate scientists, and other experts use models that simulate the impacts of emissions and the benefits of mitigation actions. These models consider the complex interplay between emissions, the climate system, and the economy, and estimate the social benefits and costs associated with reducing emissions.

The SCC estimate is used by policymakers to help determine the most cost-effective ways to reduce emissions and to minimize the costs of climate change impacts. The estimate is typically expressed in terms of dollars per ton of carbon dioxide, and is updated regularly to reflect the latest scientific knowledge and economic data.

Henry Craver's picture
Henry Craver on Feb 9, 2023

"It includes the direct effects of emissions on human health, such as respiratory problems..."

It's always seemed like the great mistake of Climate Activism has been its emphasis on far off problems and relative silence on current air quality issues. Don't get me wrong, I understand the moral imperative to mitigate climate change for future generations, but most people won't. Most people are much more likely to take an interest in the cause if they're told their lungs are being damaged now, increased risk of cancer etc. 

Aniket Kumar's picture
Thank Aniket for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »