This group brings together those who are interested in topics around oil and gas exploration, drilling, refining, and processing.

Post

Mountain Valley: As the pipeline turns

Kennedy Maize's picture
Editor and Publisher, The Quad Report

Over 40 years experience as an energy and environmental journalist. Experience with Congressional Quarterly, The Energy Daily, The Electricity Daily (founder and editor), POWER magazine, The Quad...

  • Member since 2023
  • 104 items added with 21,067 views
  • Mar 4, 2024
  • 194 views

Two new episodes in the long-running energy soap opera called the Mountain Valley Pipeline.

On Feb. 13, a federal appeals court again rebuffed local opponents of the natural gas pipeline being constructed 304 miles across West Virginia to Virginia and North Carolina, carrying gas from the Marcellus and Utica shale formations. The case has been up and down from federal courts, putting the project in suspended animation.

The courts in many cases have consistently ruled that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has authority to grant the pipeline developers the right of federal eminent domain, overriding state and local land use laws.

Just a week later (Feb. 20), the pipeline developers – a joint venture of Equitrans Midstream Corporation; Next Era Energy; Consolidated Edison; AltaGas; and RGC Resources, with Cannonsburg, Pa.-based Equitrans the major partner and eventual operator of the pipeline – announced another delay in the project and a significant hike in the estimated cost.

In the latest court case, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, on remand from the Supreme Court, said that “we again conclude that the Natural Gas Act explicitly strips district courts of jurisdiction to review a FERC certificate after a court of appeals receives the record in a suit challenging that certificate.”

An analysis from the D.C. law firm of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld wrote, “The D.C. Circuit came to the same conclusion in a 2022 decision. However, that decision was vacated by the U.S. Supreme Court,” which remanded the case back to the appeals court because of the wording of the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) and its application in a case involving review of a business merger, Axon Enterprise Inc. v. FTC.

More....

 

Discussions

No discussions yet. Start a discussion below.

Kennedy Maize's picture
Thank Kennedy for the Post!
Energy Central contributors share their experience and insights for the benefit of other Members (like you). Please show them your appreciation by leaving a comment, 'liking' this post, or following this Member.
More posts from this member

Get Published - Build a Following

The Energy Central Power Industry Network® is based on one core idea - power industry professionals helping each other and advancing the industry by sharing and learning from each other.

If you have an experience or insight to share or have learned something from a conference or seminar, your peers and colleagues on Energy Central want to hear about it. It's also easy to share a link to an article you've liked or an industry resource that you think would be helpful.

                 Learn more about posting on Energy Central »