Thu.Dec 20, 2018

article thumbnail

California Appeals Court: Which Conflicting Limitations Period Applies to CEQA Claim

Latham's Clean Energy Law Report

CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development [i]. By Christopher H. Norton , Lucas I. Quass and Megan K. Ampe. In a published opinion issued on October 23, 2018, Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette , Case No. A154168, the California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s decision to grant a demurrer without leave to amend with respect to challenges to the substantive and procedural requirements of applicable planning and zoning laws, but reversed with respect to

Law 40
article thumbnail

California Appeals Court: Which Conflicting Limitations Period Applies to CEQA Claim

Latham's Clean Energy Law Report

CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development [i]. By Christopher H. Norton , Lucas I. Quass and Megan K. Ampe. In a published opinion issued on October 23, 2018, Save Lafayette Trees v. City of Lafayette , Case No. A154168, the California Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s decision to grant a demurrer without leave to amend with respect to challenges to the substantive and procedural requirements of applicable planning and zoning laws, but reversed with respect to

Law 40